One-bond 1J(15N,H) coupling constants at sp2-hybridized nitrogen of Schiff bases, enaminones and similar compounds: A theoretical study

11Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

1J(15N,H) coupling constants for enaminones and NH-forms of intramolecularly hydrogen-bonded Schiff bases as model compounds for sp2-hybridized nitrogen atoms are evaluated using density functional theory (DFT) to find the optimal functionals and basis sets. Ammonia is used as a test molecule and its one-bond coupling constant is compared with experiment. A methylamine Schiff base of a truncated molecule of gossypol is used for checking the performance of selected B3LYP, O3LYP, PBE, BHandH, and APFD density functionals and standard, modified, and dedicated basis sets for coupling constants. Both in vacuum and in chloroform, modeled by the simple continuum model of solvent, the modified basis sets predict significantly better the 1J(15N,H) value in ammonia and in the methylamine Schiff base of a truncated molecule of gossypol than the standard basis sets. This procure is then used on a broad set of intramolecularly hydrogen-bonded molecules, and a good correlation between calculated and experimental one-bond NH coupling constants is obtained. The 1J(15N,H) couplings are slightly overestimated. The calculated data show for hydrogen-bonded NH interatomic distances that the calculated values depend on the NH bond lengths. The shorter the bond lengths, the larger the 1J(15N,H). A useful correlation between 1J(15N,H) and NH bond length is derived that enables realistic predictions of one-bond NH coupling constants. The calculations reproduce experimentally observed trends for the studied molecules.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hansen, P. E., Saeed, B. A., Rutu, R. S., & Kupka, T. (2020). One-bond 1J(15N,H) coupling constants at sp2-hybridized nitrogen of Schiff bases, enaminones and similar compounds: A theoretical study. Magnetic Resonance in Chemistry, 58(8), 750–762. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrc.5052

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free