The Impact of Parental Myopia and High Myopia on the Hyperopia Reserve of Preschool Children

1Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to explore the association between parental myopia and high myopia with children's refraction and ocular biometry in large-scale Chinese preschool children from the Beijing Hyperopia Reserve Study. Subjects/Methods: This cross-sectional kindergarten-based study enrolled children aged 3.6 years. Cycloplegic refraction, axial length (AL), and corneal radius (CR) were measured for all children. Parents were asked to complete a questionnaire about refractive status (no myopia, mild myopia -6 D). Results: The study enrolled 2,053 children (1,069 boys and 984 girls), with a mean age of 4.26±0.96 years and mean spherical equivalent refraction (SER) of 1.11±0.97 diopter. Of the children, 90.7% had at least one myopic parent, and 511 children (24.9%) had at least one highly myopic parent. SER decreased significantly with increasing severity of parental myopia (p < 0.001). Preschool children fs myopia was independently associated with parental myopia (OR, 10.4 and 11.5 for one and two highly myopic parent[s]). Age (OR = 1.1), gender (OR = 1.7; girls as references), near work time (OR = 1.2), and both maternal (OR, 1.4 and 2.0 for moderate and high myopia) and paternal myopia (OR, 1.6 and 1.9 for moderate and high myopia) were independent risk factors for lacking hyperopia reserve. Conclusion: Severe parental myopia was associated with a lower SER, longer AL, and higher AL/CR ratio in preschool children. Parental myopia and near work may predispose children to faster elimination of hyperopia reserves before exposure to higher educational stress.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pu, J., Fang, Y., Zhou, Z., Chen, W., Hu, J., Jin, S., … Jiao, Y. (2023). The Impact of Parental Myopia and High Myopia on the Hyperopia Reserve of Preschool Children. Ophthalmic Research, 67(1), 115–124. https://doi.org/10.1159/000535193

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free