Comparative analysis of SARC-F-EBM, Ishii test, and six other screening tools for sarcopenia in Chinese community-dwelling older adults: a cross-sectional diagnostic study

Abstract

To assess the relative performance of simple screening methods for sarcopenia in Chinese community-dwelling older adults. Data of older adults aged ≥ 60 were collected through a cross-sectional investigation. Sarcopenia was defined according to the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019 criteria. The accuracy of screening methods was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the ROC curves (AUC). The AUC value greater than 0.8 represented the good screening ability. A total of 918 older adults (44.3% men, mean age 70.4 ± 6.5 years) were included in this study. The overall prevalence rates of possible sarcopenia, confirmed sarcopenia, and severe sarcopenia were 59.5%, 12.8%, and 5.9%, respectively. In men, the SARC-F-EBM and Ishii tests indicated good screening capabilities for confirmed sarcopenia, with an AUC of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.77–0.85) and 0.80 (95% CI: 0.76–0.84), respectively. In women, the highest AUC was also achieved using the SARC-F-EBM at 0.79 (95% CI: 0.75–0.82), followed by the Ishii test at 0.77 (95% CI: 0.74–0.81), showing the moderate efficacy. A ranking diagram showed that SARC-F-EBM was most likely to be considered the best method for diagnosing sarcopenia in terms of AUC and sensitivity, regardless of sex. We recommend the SARC-F-EBM for sarcopenia screening in community-dwelling Chinese older adults when respondents are able to answer the questionnaire accurately; otherwise, the Ishii test consisting entirely of objective measures could be used.