Monitoring the Invisible: Metacognitive Monitoring Strategies Uncover Hidden Barriers in EFL Deep Reading

  • Peng C
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study explores the efficacy of metacognition strategies in assisting English learners in overcoming the challenges posed by implicit comprehension during reading. While metacognition has been shown to facilitate reading, in the context of language and cultural influences that distort the understanding of English, the metacognitive monitoring components of interest – namely, real-time self-assessment and error detection – have yet to be thoroughly investigated. The study examines three types of monitoring: linguistic (vocabulary and grammar), textual (coherence), and conceptual (argument evaluation). The study’s findings suggest that excessive reliance on superficial cues can lead to misinterpretation of comprehension. Additionally, the study proposes practical classroom strategies, such as structural reflection prompts, to ensure effective monitoring. These strategies aim to maintain congruence between perception and actual understanding. The study’s findings suggest that metacognition can be a valuable tool in facilitating English teaching by considering the influence of teaching methods and cultural contexts on learning.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Peng, C. (2025). Monitoring the Invisible: Metacognitive Monitoring Strategies Uncover Hidden Barriers in EFL Deep Reading. Cognitive Strategies in Study, 1(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.63808/css.v1i2.154

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free