Phrenic nerve study as outcome in clinical trials for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Abstract

Introduction: Respiratory tests are fundamental for monitoring respiratory function in ALS, and essential in clinical trials. Slow vital capacity (SVC) was canceled in some countries to prevent COVID-19 transmission. We aimed to test phrenic nerve motor responses as an option to SVC in clinical trials. Methodology: Patients followed-up in our unit were selected respecting inclusion criteria used elsewhere: possible/probable/definite disease; onset-age 18–80years; disease duration from disease duration ≤24months; body mass index (BMI)>20kg/m2; respiratory subscore of the revised ALS functional rating scale (ALSFRS-R)≥11; upright SVC ≥ 70%. We added normal phrenic responses (meanPhrenAmpl, ≥0.4mV). All patients were on riluzole. SVC and meanPhrenAmpl were recorded at study entry (T0) and 24 weeks later (T1). Decays were determined. Sample size was calculated for a treatment effect of 30% on the decay rate. Results: We included 317 ALS patients (191 males, 225 spinal-onset), mean onset-age 59.9 ± 10.7 (31–80)years, mean onset BMI 25.48 ± 3.2 (20.1–35)kg/m2, mean disease duration 10.5 ± 5.6 (1–24)months, mean ALSFRS-R 41.54 ± 4.3 (22–47) and respiratory subscore 11.83 ± 0.38 (11–12). MeanPhrenAmpl and SVC were weakly but significantly correlated at T0 and T1. At T1, MeanPhrenAmpl decayed 16.94 ± 16.45% and SVC 13.5 ± 16.86%. For the proposed drug effect, 174 and 272 patients would be needed to recruit using respectively meanPhrenAmpl and SVC decline as the primary outcome measurement (accepting no dropouts). Discussion: Contrary to SVC, meanPhrenAmpl is non-volitional and not associated with aerosolization risk. Lower recruitment number (98 patients less) would be needed, translating shorter inclusion period, trial length and costs, and probable lower missed data rate. MeanPhrenAmp is an alternative test in ALS clinical trials.