Rise of clinical studies in the field of machine learning: A review of data registered in clinicaltrials.gov

18Citations
Citations of this article
101Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Although advances in machine-learning healthcare applications promise great potential for innovative medical care, few data are available on the translational status of these new technol-ogies. We aimed to provide a comprehensive characterization of the development and status quo of clinical studies in the field of machine learning. For this purpose, we performed a registry-based analysis of machine-learning-related studies that were published and first available in the Clinical-Trials.gov database until 2020, using the database’s study classification. In total, n = 358 eligible studies could be included in the analysis. Of these, 82% were initiated by academic institutions/uni-versity (hospitals) and 18% by industry sponsors. A total of 96% were national and 4% international. About half of the studies (47%) had at least one recruiting location in a country in North America, followed by Europe (37%) and Asia (15%). Most of the studies reported were initiated in the medical field of imaging (12%), followed by cardiology, psychiatry, anesthesia/intensive care medicine (all 11%) and neurology (10%). Although the majority of the clinical studies were still initiated in an academic research context, the first industry-financed projects on machine-learning-based algorithms are becoming visible. The number of clinical studies with machine-learning-related applications and the variety of medical challenges addressed serve to indicate their increasing importance in future clinical care. Finally, they also set a time frame for the adjustment of medical device-related regulation and governance.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zippel, C., & Bohnet-Joschko, S. (2021). Rise of clinical studies in the field of machine learning: A review of data registered in clinicaltrials.gov. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18105072

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free