Polynomial neural networks versus other spam email filters: An empirical study

0Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Spam or junk e-mail problems are increasing exponentially due to the huge growth of internet users and their high dependency on e-mails as the main communication means nowadays. Such problems result in huge amounts of time and cost waste for both individuals and organizations. This research paper directly compares the performance of four famous text classification algorithms in classifying emails and detecting the spam ones: Polynomial Neural Networks (PNNs), the k-nearest neighbour (k-NN), Support Vector Machines (SVM) and Naïve Bayes (NB). Results of the experiments conducted on Lingspam, the benchmark E-mail corpus, in this research work reveals that PNNs is a competitive spam filter to the sate-of-the-art spam filters. It recorded either equal or superior results in most of the performance measures used to evaluate the four spam filters.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Al-Tahrawi, M., Abualhaj, M., & Al-Khatib, S. (2020). Polynomial neural networks versus other spam email filters: An empirical study. TEM Journal, 9(1), 136–143. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM91-19

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free