The Relationship Between Low-Income College Students’ Time Use and Well-Being: A Mixed Methods Exploration

11Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Recent reports show that low-income students make up a significant share of those participating in higher education, and their well-being constitutes a key factor that influences their college success. This mixed-methods study examined first-year, low-income students’ time use and its relationship to well-being framed by an equity-oriented lens that recognizes the time constraints low-income students navigate. Our mixed methods findings identified the link between time use and well-being and—critically—empirical explanations for these links. First, leveraging a unique experience sampling survey design and multilevel analyses, we found that attending class, studying or doing homework, and working for pay were consistently and adversely related to low-income students’ well-being. Low-income students who were also first-generation in college fared worse than continuing-generation students when engaging in these experiences. On the other hand, socializing was positively related to low-income students’ well-being. Second, an exploration of longitudinal data from hundreds of student interviews illuminated two primary factors that shaped the relationship between low-income students’ time use and well-being: (a) structuring time and developing a routine, and (b) the power of reflection and meaning-making. These findings provide important novel insights about low-income students’ college experiences and the relationship between their time use and well-being, and offer crucial guidance for educators on how to support low-income students’ well-being as they navigate college.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kitchen, J. A., Bowman, N. A., Todorova, R., Irwin, L. N., & Corwin, Z. B. (2024). The Relationship Between Low-Income College Students’ Time Use and Well-Being: A Mixed Methods Exploration. Research in Higher Education, 65(8), 1934–1964. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-024-09812-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free