Between Justice and Pragmatism: Operationalizing Islamic Ethics in Indonesia’s Foreign Policy on Palestine

1Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This study explores the integration of Islamic ethical discourse into Indonesian foreign policymaking in relation to Palestine, specifically in responses to the Gaza crisis. It traces Indonesia’s engagement with both normative ideals and pragmatic strategies in domestic and international contexts. Drawing on primary sources, including United Nations (UN) and International Court of Justice (ICJ) statements, this study examines the significance of Islam Wasatiyah (Moderate Islam) and pluralist-democracy for Indonesia’s international standing. This study suggests that Indonesian foreign policy balances ethical idealism and realist statecraft aimed at projecting soft power to the global south and act as a responsible state on the international stage. However, this dual objective presents Jakarta with the risk of a credibility gap as ethical commitments encounter structural barriers and great-power politics. By examining Indonesia’s Gaza diplomacy, this study offers new insights on how Islamic ethical statecraft can reinforce humanitarian and legal norms while remaining constrained by the very multilateral structures it seeks to humanise.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Akbarzadeh, S. (2026). Between Justice and Pragmatism: Operationalizing Islamic Ethics in Indonesia’s Foreign Policy on Palestine. Studia Islamika, 33(1), 143–173. https://doi.org/10.36712/sdi.v33i1.46677

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free