Abstract
Linear regression models are often used to represent the cost and effectiveness of medical treatment. The covariates used may include sociodemographic variables, such as age, gender or race; clinical variables, such as initial health status, years of treatment or the existence of concomitant illnesses; and a binary variable indicating the treatment received. However, most studies estimate only one model, which usually includes all the covariates. This procedure ignores the question of uncertainty in model selection. In this paper, we examine four alternative Bayesian variable selection methods that have been proposed. In this analysis, we estimate the inclusion probability of each covariate in the real model conditional on the data. Variable selection can be useful for estimating incremental effectiveness and incremental cost, through Bayesian model averaging, as well as for subgroup analysis. © 2010 by the authors; licensee Molecular Diversity Preservation International, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license. © 2010 by the authors.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Negrín, M. A., Vázquez-Polo, F. J., Martel, M., Moreno, E., & Girón, F. J. (2010). Bayesian variable selection in cost-effectiveness analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 7(4), 1577–1596. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph7041577
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.