Abstract
This article focuses on an aspect of traditional instruction - the form-only activities commonly called "drills," "mechanical practice," or "pattern practice." The authors first distinguish language as an internalized system from language as a productive skill and review the nature of mechanical pratice. They contend that despite claims made about communicative language teaching and its goals, drills and form-only foreign language activities are still widely used in today's classrooms. After reviewing research on the utility of drills, the authors conclude that these activities are not necessary or beneficial for foreign language acquisition or the development of fluency and should be discarded from instructional practice.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Wong, W., & VanPatten, B. (2003). The evidence is drills are OUT. Foreign Language Annals, 36(3), 403–423. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2003.tb02123.x
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.