Emotional dissonance and job satisfaction: The moderating role of organisational commitment and task significance

4Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aim: Emotional dissonance resulting from nurse/patient interactions is usually considered to lead to negative outcomes, such as job dissatisfaction (Yang & Chang, 2008). Although there does exist some general support and acceptance of the positive link between emotional dissonance and job dissatisfaction, there are some inconsistencies in these findings (Pugh, Groth, & Hennig-Thurau, 2010). The aim of our study is to verify whether the relationship between emotional dissonance and job satisfaction can be influenced by organizational commitment and task significance. Method: A questionnaire was distributed to 222 nurses, working in two multidisciplinary hospitals in the Northwest region of Italy. Results and conclusion: Results provide support for the moderating role of organizational affective commitment and task significance. Organizational affective commitment and task significance can help nurses in moderating the detrimental effects of emotional dissonance on job satisfaction.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Santo, L. D., Pohl, S., & Battistelli, A. (2013). Emotional dissonance and job satisfaction: The moderating role of organisational commitment and task significance. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 4(13), 691–698. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2013.v4n13p691

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free