Research of the major methods and clinical outcomes of irrigation in endodontics: a systematic review

  • Souza R
  • Castro F
  • Pires O
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: In the context of endodontic treatment, mainly endodontic irrigation, endodontic therapy promotes the removal of debris from the pulp tissue, seeking cleaning and asepsis against various microorganisms. Objective: Carried out a systematic review of the main methods and clinical outcomes of irrigation in endodontics, presenting information on the effectiveness and biocompatibility on the dentin surface. Methods: The present study followed by a systematic review (PRISMA). The search strategy was performed in the PubMed, Scielo, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Scopus, and Google Scholar databases. Results and Conclusion: The success of endodontic treatment depends on eradicating microbes (if present) from the root canal system and preventing reinfection. In research comparing the effectiveness of EDTA 17% maleic acid to 7%, and observed a greater effectiveness of maleic acid in removing the smear layer from the apical third of single-adicular human teeth. When compared to maleic acid, 5% of 17% EDTA proved to be equally effective. Irrigation with 70% ethanol showed a significantly higher percentage of clean root canal walls and greater depth of clean dentinal tubules when compared to irrigation with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite and 17% EDTA-T. The volume of irrigants and agitation act to reduce the microhardness of dentin in the root canal. The smallest reduction in hardness was found in the EDTA + NaOCl association, which can be explained by the fact that one substance has the power to neutralize the other. An alternative EDTA (EDTA - T) to the conventional one was studied and showed good results to remove the smear layer and a good antimicrobial action, but showed a greater potential to generate inflammation than conventional 17% EDTA and 10% citric acid. Finally, one study showed that PUI with continuous irrigation and SAF were more effective than EndoVac and the conventional syringe in removing the drug Ca(OH)2 from a standardized artificial groove in the apical part of the root canal.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Souza, R. A. de, Castro, F. P. L. de, & Pires, O. J. (2022). Research of the major methods and clinical outcomes of irrigation in endodontics: a systematic review. MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences, 3(S3). https://doi.org/10.54448/mdnt22s311

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free