Abstract
This report focuses on moral description. It considers how comparative practices often entangle moral geography in philosophical dilemmas, such as debates over moral relativism. Using examples from geographic work on language, algorithms, the appropriation of anti-colonial critique, and Indigenous data sovereignty, the report shows how and why descriptive praxis matters to accounts of moral geography. As the final installation of a three-part series of reports on ethics and geography, it draws together a broader critique of moral geography's initial distinctions and suggests a more constitutive view of ethics for geographic scholarship.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Schmidt, J. J. (2024). Geography and ethics III: Description as a matter of moral concern. Progress in Human Geography, 48(6), 934–942. https://doi.org/10.1177/03091325241269767
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.