Adiposity signaling and biological defense against weight gain: Absence of protection or central hormone resistance?

82Citations
Citations of this article
60Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

An abundant and compelling literature supports the existence of a homeostatic system that dynamically adjusts energy intake and energy expenditure to promote stability of body fat mass. In the context of this system, the ease with which many individuals gain weight is difficult to explain. Some have argued that energy homeostasis operates primarily to defend against weight loss and that, over the course of evolution, biological defense against weight gain was not selected for. According to this Absence of Protection model, obesity is seen as the natural result of living in an obesigenic environment. An alternative hypothesis, termed the Central Resistance model, proposes that under normal circumstances, the energy homeostasis system provides an effective defense against weight gain as well as weight loss and that common forms of obesity involve genetic or acquired defects (or interactions between them) that impair the function of this system. Here, we discuss these dichotomous possibilities within the context of current literature regarding energy homeostasis and suggest a strategy for distinguishing between them.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schwartz, M. W., & Niswender, K. D. (2004). Adiposity signaling and biological defense against weight gain: Absence of protection or central hormone resistance? Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. Endocrine Society. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2004-0906

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free