Abstract
Platinum/taxane combinations are widely used in patients with carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP), yielding response rates of 30% and median overall survival of 9-11 months in selected patients. Yet these combinations have not been subject to a randomised trial to overcome selection bias, a major problem in CUP. We randomised 92 patients to either paclitaxel/carboplatin (arm A) or the non-platinum non-taxane regimen gemcitabine/vinorelbine (arm B). The primary endpoint was rate of practicability as defined: application of ≥2 cycles of therapy (1) with a maximal delay of 1 week (2) and survival of ≥8 months (3). Practicability was shown in 52.4% (95% CI 36-68%) in arm A and in 42.2% (95% CI 28-58%) in arm B, respectively. The median overall survival, 1-year survival -rate and response rate of patients treated in arm A was 11.0 months, 38, and 23.8%, arm B 7.0 months, 29, and 20%. In conclusion, the paclitaxel/carboplatin regimen showed clinically meaningful activity in this randomised trial (Clinical trial registration number 219, 'Deutsches KrebsStudienRegister', German Cancer Society.) © 2009 Cancer Research UK.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Huebner, G., Link, H., Kohne, C. H., Stahl, M., Kretzschmar, A., Steinbach, S., … Jahn, A. (2009). Paclitaxel and carboplatin vs gemcitabine and vinorelbine in patients with adeno- or undifferentiated carcinoma of unknown primary: A randomised prospective phase II trial. British Journal of Cancer, 100(1), 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604818
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.