Allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in patients with hematologic malignancies after dose-escalated treosulfan/fludarabine conditioning

85Citations
Citations of this article
57Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: Treosulfan was introduced recently as a conditioning agent for allogeneic blood stem-cell transplantation. The favorable nonhematologic toxicity profile at 3 × 10 g/m2 was the basis for dose escalation in this prospective, multicenter trial. Patients and Methods: Fifty-six patients with various hematologic malignancies who were not eligible for standard conditioning were treated with one of three doses: 10 g/m 2, 12 g/m2, or 14 g/m2 of intravenous treosulfan, which was administered on days -6 to -4 combined with fludarabine 30 mg/m2 on days -6 to -2. Patients in complete remission (CR; 42%) or non-CR (58%) received grafts from matched related (47%) or matched unrelated (51%) donors; one patient had a mismatched related donor (2%). Results: No engraftment failure occurred. Overall, extramedullary toxicity and the nonrelapse mortality rate at 2 years (20%) were low and did not increase with dose. Cumulative incidence of relapse/ progression reached 31%. The overall survival and progression-free survival rates were 64% and 49%, respectively, in the total study population. An inverse dose dependency of relapse incidence was indicated in the subgroup receiving transplantations from matched related donors (P = .0568). Conclusion: Treosulfan-based conditioning was feasible at all three doses. The 3 × 14 g/m2 dose was selected for additional studies, because it combines desired characteristics of low toxicity and a low relapse rate. © 2010 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Casper, J., Wolff, D., Knauf, W., Blau, I. W., Ruutu, T., Volin, L., … Freund, M. (2010). Allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in patients with hematologic malignancies after dose-escalated treosulfan/fludarabine conditioning. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 28(20), 3344–3351. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.3429

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free