Moving toward a standardized national family medicine subinternship curriculum: Results from a cera clerkship directors survey

1Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Although the subinternship (sub-I) is con-sidered integral in many medical schools’ curricula, family medicine does not have standardized course recommendations. Given the variable nature of this clinical experience, this study investigated the potential role of a standardized sub-I curriculum in family medicine. METHODS: Questions about sub-Is were created and data were gathered and analyzed as part of the 2019 Council of Academic Family Medicine’s (CAFM) Educational Research Alliance (CERA) survey of family medicine clerkship directors. The survey was distributed via email to 126 US and 16 Canadian recipients between June 19, 2019 and August 2, 2019 through the online program SurveyMonkey. RESULTS: A total of 101 (71.1%) of 142 clerkship directors responded to the survey. Most (84.2%) schools require sub-Is. There was a positive association between students matching into family medicine and having family medicine sub-Is at residency programs (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sairenji, T., Stumbar, S. E., Garba, N. A., Bhoite, P., de la Cruz, M. S., Stubbs, C., … Everard, K. M. (2020). Moving toward a standardized national family medicine subinternship curriculum: Results from a cera clerkship directors survey. Family Medicine, 52(7), 523–527. https://doi.org/10.22454/FamMed.2020.209444

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free