Abstract
A mixture of water, pyridine and acetonitrile is obtained as a by-product during the pharmaceutical industry. Azeotropic-extractive distillation (AED) and azeotropic-pressure swing distillation (APSD) are used to separate this mixture. In this work, we perform an optimization study of the total energy consumption of both processes by using a single factor analysis and response surface methodology (RSM). Compared to single factor optimization, the results showed that the energy saving optimized by RSM of AED and APSD was 37.27% and 27.36% respectively. The heat exchange network is optimized according to ASPEN ENERGY ANALYSIS. The results showed that the energy saving of AED and APSD after heat transfer optimization was 12.3% and 33%, respectively. By comparing the energy consumption of the two processes, it was found that the optimized AED process had an energy saving of about 1.05% compared with APSD. However, since there is no extractant entrainment in the APSD process, the APSD process is finally selected.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Liang, J., Wang, H., Wang, Z., Baena-Moreno, F. M., Sebastia-Saez, D., & Li, C. (2021). Optimal separation of acetonitrile and pyridine from industrial wastewater. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 169, 54–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2021.03.009
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.