Optimal separation of acetonitrile and pyridine from industrial wastewater

14Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A mixture of water, pyridine and acetonitrile is obtained as a by-product during the pharmaceutical industry. Azeotropic-extractive distillation (AED) and azeotropic-pressure swing distillation (APSD) are used to separate this mixture. In this work, we perform an optimization study of the total energy consumption of both processes by using a single factor analysis and response surface methodology (RSM). Compared to single factor optimization, the results showed that the energy saving optimized by RSM of AED and APSD was 37.27% and 27.36% respectively. The heat exchange network is optimized according to ASPEN ENERGY ANALYSIS. The results showed that the energy saving of AED and APSD after heat transfer optimization was 12.3% and 33%, respectively. By comparing the energy consumption of the two processes, it was found that the optimized AED process had an energy saving of about 1.05% compared with APSD. However, since there is no extractant entrainment in the APSD process, the APSD process is finally selected.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Liang, J., Wang, H., Wang, Z., Baena-Moreno, F. M., Sebastia-Saez, D., & Li, C. (2021). Optimal separation of acetonitrile and pyridine from industrial wastewater. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 169, 54–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2021.03.009

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free