Accuracy comparison study of new smartphone-based semen analyzer versus laboratory sperm quality analyzer

14Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to test the clinical efficacy of a portable smartphone-based App assisted semen analysis (SA) system, O'VIEW-M PRO® to clinically accurate in comparison with results of laboratory-based conventional semen analyses including manual microscopic and computer-assisted semen analysis (CASA) for self-evaluation of seminal parameters. Materials and Methods: From January to May 2021, a total of 39 semen samples were analyzed for the sperm concentration and motility with new smartphone-based App assisted semen analyzer, O'VIEW-M PRO®, and results compared with those from labora-tory-based manual microscopic SA with Makler Counting Chamber and CASA. Results: The coefficient factors among the results of the measurement with Makler chamber and laboratory-based CASA comparing to O'VIEW-M PRO® were 0.666 and 0.655 for sperm density, 0.662 and 0.658 for sperm motility, respectively. There were no particular problems with clinical use of the O'VIEW-M PRO®. Device performance in classifying samples is positive (<15×106 sperm/ mL) and negative (>15×106 sperm/mL) for sperm concentration criteria, and positive (<40%) and negative (>40%) for sperm mo-tility criteria. The smartphone-based App assisted SA O'VIEW-M PRO® showed a sensitivity of 92.6%, a specificity of 66.7%, and overall accuracy rate of 84.6%. Conclusions: This study shows a novel smartphone-based App assisted SA system. O'VIEW-M PRO® can easily obtain semen pa-rameter information through self-diagnosis at home and induce infertile men's treatment and help patients after receiving infertile men's treatment before receiving treatment.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Park, M. J., Lim, M. Y., Park, H. J., & Park, N. C. (2021). Accuracy comparison study of new smartphone-based semen analyzer versus laboratory sperm quality analyzer. Investigative and Clinical Urology, 62(6), 672–680. https://doi.org/10.4111/icu.20210266

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free