Pessimists, Optimists, and Skeptics: The Consequences of Transnational Ties for Latino Immigrant Naturalization

19Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: Central to current debates over immigration is the impact of transnational ties on immigrant political incorporation in the United States. Some researchers believe these ties hinder incorporation, while others have found a positive relationship between these variables, and yet other scholars have found that transnational connections exert no significant impact on immigrant behavior in the United States. We test these competing hypotheses in an attempt to resolve this scholarly debate. Methods: We rely on data from the 2006 Latino National Survey and use logistic regression to test the impact of transnational ties on immigrant political incorporation (via naturalization). Results: Transnational ties positively impact immigrants' orientations toward citizenship and eventual naturalization. Conclusions: Immigrant political incorporation is not a unidirectional process where immigrant engagement in the United States increases with disengagement in the ancestral homeland. Rather, Latino immigrants with ties to their ancestral homelands are more likely to desire and seek out U.S. citizenship. © 2013 by the Southwestern Social Science Association.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gershon, S. A., & Pantoja, A. D. (2014). Pessimists, Optimists, and Skeptics: The Consequences of Transnational Ties for Latino Immigrant Naturalization. Social Science Quarterly, 95(2), 328–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12044

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free