Change in walking cadence as a digital outcome measure of clinically meaningful improvement in gait speed and 6-minute walk test distance after a mobility intervention in older adults

0Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Mobility assessments are essential for evaluating baseline function and monitoring responses to interventions in older adults. Usual-pace gait speed and the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) are widely used and reproducible measures with established minimum clinically important differences (MCIDs) to distinguish responders from non-responders. However, both require in-person administration, limiting their scalability in clinical trials and population-based studies. Walking cadence, a measure of walking intensity that can be captured digitally, may offer a scalable alternative for identifying responders versus non-responders to mobility interventions. We conducted a secondary analysis of the prospective Program to Improve Mobility in Aging (PRIMA) cohort trial to evaluate whether changes in walking cadence after a walking intervention could identify responders versus non-responders. Cadence was measured during usual-pace gait speed testing and the 6MWT, and logistic regression models assessed its ability to predict achievement of MCIDs for gait speed (>0.1 m/s) and 6MWT distance (>30 m) in older adults. Data from 213 participants were analyzed. Change in median walking cadence predicted improvement in usual-pace gait speed with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.85–0.94). The Youden Index identified an increase of ≥3 steps/min as the optimal threshold (sensitivity 0.81; specificity 0.88). For predicting improvement in 6MWT distance, the AUC was 0.80 (95% CI: 0.74–0.86), with the same ≥3 steps/min threshold (sensitivity 0.75; specificity 0.77). These findings suggest that changes in walking cadence during usual-pace gait and the 6MWT may serve as a digitally measurable outcome to identify responders to mobility interventions. Further research is warranted to validate these findings in remote and real-world applications.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rubin, D. S., Glynn, N. W., Straczkiewicz, M., Danilovich, M. K., Sciamanna, C., & Brach, J. S. (2026). Change in walking cadence as a digital outcome measure of clinically meaningful improvement in gait speed and 6-minute walk test distance after a mobility intervention in older adults. PLOS ONE, 21(5 May). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0337414

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free