Efficacy and safety of empagliflozin in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

37Citations
Citations of this article
93Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objectives: The prevalence of diabetes has increased in the recent decades and optimum glycemic control is required to reduce morbidity and mortality. We meta-analyzed randomized controlled trials in order to assess the efficacy and safety of empagliflozin compared to placebo in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. Methods: We included double-blind, placebo controlled trials of empagliflozin that evaluated glycemic efficacy and safety (10 mg or 25 mg) either as monotherapy or as add-on to existing diabetes pharmacotherapy. Results: The results demonstrated significant improvements in HbA1c (SMD −0.929%, 95 % CI −1.064 to −0.793, for 10 mg and −1.064%, 95 % CI −1.184 to −0.944, for 25 mg) and FPG (SMD −0.929%, 95 % CI −1.064 to −0.793, for 10 mg and −1.064%, 95 % CI −1.184 to −0.944, for 25 mg) with empagliflozin monotherapy (n = 609) compared to placebo. Significant improvements in HbA1c [SMD −1.582%, 95% CI −2.164 to −1.000, for 10 mg (n = 1079) and −1.668%, 95% CI −2.260 to −1.077, for 25 mg (n = 1070)] and FPG [SMD −0.865 mmol/L, 95 % CI −1.309 to −0.420, for 10 mg (n = 854) and −0.996 mmol/L, 95% CI −1.456 to −0.536, for 25 mg (n = 854)] were also observed in empagliflozin add-on therapy trials. Reductions in blood pressure and body weight were also seen in both monotherapy and add-on therapy. Empagliflozin was associated with increased risk of hypoglycemia, genital and urinary tract infections (OR 1.043, 2.814, 1.119 respectively). Conclusion: This meta-analysis shows empagliflozin is safe and effective for the treatment of T2DM along with existing diabetes pharmacotherapy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Devi, R., Mali, G., Chakraborty, I., Unnikrishnan, M. K., & Abdulsalim, S. (2017). Efficacy and safety of empagliflozin in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Postgraduate Medicine, 129(3), 382–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/00325481.2017.1259544

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free