Supply chain roles and performance measurement procedures: evidence from Brazilian agribusiness companies

1Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to analyse the extent to which companies’ roles in supply chain coordination mechanisms affect supply chain (S.C.) performance measurement processes. It addresses the gap in the S.C. performance measurement literature for empirical studies of participant roles across whole supply chains. A survey of 114 individual agribusiness companies was undertaken in Brazil, and it was found that both performance measurement process and performance indicators selection were statistically related to the role played by companies in supply chain coordination mechanisms. Usage of performance indicators regarding new customers and quality was also statistically related to the role played by companies in supply chain mechanisms, as was the overall usage of internal processes performance indicators. The findings also suggest that the specificities of an S.C. coordination mechanism could be related to the design and implementation of S.C. management control practices, rather than being based only on contracts and formal long term agreements.

References Powered by Scopus

A framework for supply chain performance measurement

1602Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Measuring supply chain performance

1565Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Supply chain design and analysis: Models and methods

1414Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Modeling the impact of resilience factors and relational practice on performance of the supply chain

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Callado, A. A. C., & Jack, L. (2021). Supply chain roles and performance measurement procedures: evidence from Brazilian agribusiness companies. Supply Chain Forum, 22(4), 370–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/16258312.2021.1984166

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2506121824

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

41%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

29%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

18%

Researcher 2

12%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 6

33%

Business, Management and Accounting 6

33%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3

17%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0