Comparison of forced-air warming and electric heating pad for maintenance of body temperature during total knee replacement

50Citations
Citations of this article
55Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We conducted a randomised controlled trial to compare the efficacy of forced-air warming (Bair Hugger™, Augustine Medical model 500/OR, Prairie, MN) with that of an electric heating pad (Operatherm 202, KanMed, Sweden) for maintenance of intra-operative body temperature in 60 patients undergoing total knee replacement under combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia. Intra-operative tympanic and rectal temperatures and verbal analogue score for thermal comfort were recorded. There were no differences in any measurements between the two groups, with mean (SD) final rectal temperatures of 36.8 (0.4) °C with forced-air warming and 36.9 (0.4) °C with the electric pad. The heating pad is as effective as forced-air warming for maintenance of intra-operative body temperature. © 2006 The Authors Journal compilation 2006 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ng, V., Lai, A., & Ho, V. (2006). Comparison of forced-air warming and electric heating pad for maintenance of body temperature during total knee replacement. Anaesthesia, 61(11), 1100–1104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2006.04816.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free