Clinical reasoning in medicine ii: Towards an integrating definition

1Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Understanding clinical reasoning is a crucial for research, teaching, and daily clinical practice. Theoretical models could be grouped into three main non-exclusive axes. The first describes probability-based thinking, called informal Bayesian, because of its similarity to the conditional probability analysis structure. The second, from the cognitive sciences, describes reasoning as the sum of two ty-pes of thinking: type 1 (fast and intuitive) and type 2 (hypothetical-deductive). Finally, the third, intersubjective knowledge, which involves the interaction of the patient’s knowledge about his condition with the doctor’s knowledge and also makes explicit the role of emotion. In this second part, a narrative review of current theories is presented in order to propose an in-tegrative definition, in which clinical reasoning is presented as a complex, iterative and adaptive construct.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zapata-Ospina, J. P., & Zamudio-Burbano, M. A. (2021, October 1). Clinical reasoning in medicine ii: Towards an integrating definition. Iatreia. Universidad de Antioquia. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.iatreia.103

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free