Harm or Mere Inconvenience? Denying Women Emergency Contraception

  • McLeod C
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper addresses the likely impact on women of being denied emergency contraception (EC) by pharmacists who conscientiously refuse to provide it. A common view—defended by Elizabeth Fenton and Loren Lomasky, among others—is that these refusals inconvenience rather than harm women so long as the women can easily get EC somewhere else nearby. I argue from a feminist perspective that the refusals harm women even when they can easily get EC somewhere else nearby.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

McLeod, C. (2010). Harm or Mere Inconvenience? Denying Women Emergency Contraception. Hypatia, 25(1), 11–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2009.01082.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free