Removal of Nickel, Zinc and Copper from Plating Process Industrial Raw Effluent Via Hydroxide Precipitation Versus Sulphide Precipitation

37Citations
Citations of this article
139Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Electroless plating wastewater contains mixed metals element. Although precipitation is the most common method applied to remove metals from the wastewater, it fails to completely precipitate all the metals at a single pH. The present work evaluates the effectiveness of the sulphide and the hydroxide precipitation for removal of nickel, zinc and copper from industrial wastewater, namely acid rinse and nickel rinse samples. The optimum pH and coagulant dosage were determined via Jar Test for both types of samples. Sulphide precipitation removed heavy metals more efficient than hydroxide precipitation. For the acid rinse sample, 95.32% of nickel was removed using sulphide precipitation while 76.66% removal using hydroxide precipitation. For nickel rinse sample, 93.75% of zinc was removed using sulphide while 68.8% removal using hydroxide. 65.75% of nickel was removed using both sulphide and hydroxide. Total removal of copper was achieved for both hydroxide and sulphide precipitation, either from acid rinse or nickel rinse samples.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ain Zainuddin, N., Azwan Raja Mamat, T., Imam Maarof, H., Wahidah Puasa, S., & Rohana Mohd Yatim, S. (2019). Removal of Nickel, Zinc and Copper from Plating Process Industrial Raw Effluent Via Hydroxide Precipitation Versus Sulphide Precipitation. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 551). Institute of Physics Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/551/1/012122

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free