The advantages of being called NICE: A systematic review of journal article titles using the acronym for the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence

6Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

ObjectiveTo describe the use of NICE, the acronym for the UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, as both an adjective and noun in peer-reviewed journal article titles.DesignSystematic review of titles retrieved by electronic database searches.Data sourcesOvid databases (MEDLINE, All EBM Reviews, EMBASE, ERIC, CINAHL and PsycINFO) covering the formation of NICE in 1999 to February 2008.Review methodsIndependent review of eligible titles by both authors and resolution of disagreements based on consideration of full text articles.Results2274 articles were retrieved that included reference to NICE in their titles. Of these, 167 (7.3) used NICE as an adjective, most commonly in conjunction with the terms 'work', 'not so' (NICE), 'nasty', 'mess' and 'try'.ConclusionsThe work of NICE has been widely referenced in peer-reviewed journal article titles, sometimes with apparent humorous intent when used as an adjective. Well-chosen names may increase the recognizability of public health organizations and help to communicate their roles.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Morrison, D. S., & Batty, G. D. (2009). The advantages of being called NICE: A systematic review of journal article titles using the acronym for the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Journal of Public Health, 31(1), 127–130. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdn107

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free