Reliability of PainDETECT for Evaluating Low Back Pain Caused by Cluneal Nerve Entrapment

1Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Superior/middle cluneal nerve entrapment (CN-E) is an elicitor of low back pain (LBP). The painDETECT questionnaire is used to characterize CN-E symptoms. Methods: Nineteen consecutive patients with LBP caused by CN-E (superior CN-E = 7; middle CN-E = 12) participated in a Japanese language painDETECT questionnaire survey before surgery. A score of 12 or lower was recorded as ‘neuropathic component unlikely’, a score of 19 or higher as ‘neuropathic pain likely’, and scores between 13 and 18 as ‘neuropathic pain possible’. LBP severity was recorded on a numerical rating scale, the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, and the EuroQol-5 dimension-5 level. Results: The mean painDETECT score was 11.8 and did not significantly differ between the superior CN-E and middle CN-E groups. We classified low back pain as unlikely to have a neuropathic component in 13 patients, as likely to have a neuropathic component in 2 patients, and as possibly neuro-pathic in 4 patients. There was no significant difference in the pain level of patients with scores of ≤12 and ≥13 on painDETECT. All patients reported trigger pain; the positive rate was high for electric shock pain, radiating pain, and pain attacks and low for a burning or tingling sensation, pain elicited by a light touch, and pain caused by cold or hot stimulation. Conclusion: The painDETECT questionnaire may not reliably identify LBP caused by superior/middle CN-E as neuropathic pain. A diagnosis of LBP due to CN-E must be made carefully because symptoms resemble nociceptive pain.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Takada, C., Kim, K., Kokubo, R., Ideguchi, M., Mihara, R., Koketsu, K., & Murai, Y. (2024). Reliability of PainDETECT for Evaluating Low Back Pain Caused by Cluneal Nerve Entrapment. Journal of Nippon Medical School, 91(3), 328–332. https://doi.org/10.1272/jnms.JNMS.2024_91-312

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free