The role of attachment orientations in capitalization and mattering among married couples

1Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Why do some perceive a partner’s response as heartening while others interpret the same response as demoralizing? This study examined how attachment anxiety and avoidance influence perceived partner responses toward capitalization attempts (PRCA) and perceived mattering (PM) among married couples (N = 103 dyads). Dyadic analyses delineating the actor and partner effects revealed that wives’ attachment avoidance predicted own PRCA, PM, and their husbands’ PRCA. Whereas husbands’ attachment avoidance predicted own PM and their wives’ PRCA and PM, husbands’ attachment anxiety predicted only their PRCA and PM. The interaction between wife and husband attachment anxiety also predicted the husbands’ PRCA and PM. Husbands, but not wives, perceived the lowest level of PRCA and PM when both couples had high attachment anxiety. The results were discussed in the context of the interplay between attachment orientations and partner responsiveness in Turkish culture.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kırımer-Aydınlı, F., & Sümer, N. (2024). The role of attachment orientations in capitalization and mattering among married couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 41(11), 3248–3268. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075241262441

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free