Goal center width, how to count sequences, and the gambler’s fallacy in soccer penalty shootouts

7Citations
Citations of this article
80Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Previous research has reported that the gambler’s fallacy could be detected in goalkeepers’ behavior during penalty shootouts. Following repeated kicks in the same direction, goalkeepers were more likely to dive in the opposite direction on the next kick. We employ here a unique data collection approach and accurately measure the exact location of each ball when crossing the goal plane. This allows us to analyze how different definitions of the goal center width affect the results, and we show that this width indeed affects whether a gambler’s fallacy in goalkeepers’ diving behavior exists. We further augment the data with additional kicks from top international competitions and analyze the extended dataset. We also question whether previous treatments of kicking sequences adequately represent what goalkeepers consider as a run of consecutive kicks to the same side. A different representation of kicking sequences is provided and applied to the data. Overall, we find some evidence for the gambler’s fallacy after sequences of two or three kicks to the same side.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Avugos, S., Azar, O. H., Gavish, N., Sher, E., & Bar-Eli, M. (2019). Goal center width, how to count sequences, and the gambler’s fallacy in soccer penalty shootouts. Judgment and Decision Making, 14(1), 98–108. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1930297500002953

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free