Accelerated care versus standard care among patients with hip fracture: The HIP ATTACK pilot trial

102Citations
Citations of this article
168Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: A hip fracture causes bleeding, pain and immobility, and initiates inflammatory, hypercoagulable, catabolic and stress states. Accelerated surgery may improve outcomes by reducing the duration of these states and immobility. We undertook a pilot trial to determine the feasibility of a trial comparing accelerated care (i.e., rapid medical clearance and surgery) and standard care among patients with a hip fracture. Methods: Patients aged 45 years or older who, during weekday, daytime working hours, received a diagnosis of a hip fracture requiring surgery were randomly assigned to receive accelerated or standard care. Our feasibility outcomes included the proportion of eligible patients randomly assigned, completeness of follow-up and timelines of accelerated surgery. The main clinical outcome, assessed by data collectors and adjudicators who were unaware of study group allocations, was a major perioperative complication (i.e., a composite of death, preoperative myocardial infarction, myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery, pulmonary embolism, pneumonia, stroke, and life-threatening or major bleeding) within 30 days of randomization. Results: Of patients eligible for inclusion, 80% consented and were randomly assigned to groups (30 to accelerated care and 30 to standard care) at 2 centres in Canada and 1 centre in India. All patients completed 30-day follow-up. The median time from diagnosis to surgery was 6.0 hours in the accelerated care group and 24.2 hours in the standard care group (p 0.001). A major perioperative complication occurred in 9 (30%) of the patients in the accelerated care group and 14 (47%) of the patients in the standard care group (hazard ratio 0.60, 95% confidence interval 0.261.39). Interpretation: These results show the feasibility of a trial comparing accelerated and standard care among patients with hip fracture and support a definitive trial. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, no. NCT01344343. © 2014 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors.

References Powered by Scopus

CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials.

4566Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Clarifying confusion: The confusion assessment method: A new method for detection of delirium

4332Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Association of outcome with early stroke treatment: Pooled analysis of ATLANTIS, ECASS, and NINDS rt-PA stroke trials

0
2312Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

CONSORT 2010 statement: Extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials

1832Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Defining feasibility and pilot studies in preparation for randomised controlled trials: Development of a conceptual framework

849Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

CONSORT 2010 statement: Extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials

777Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Buse, G. L., Bhandari, M., Sancheti, P., Rocha, S., Winemaker, M., Adili, A., … Devereaux, P. J. (2014). Accelerated care versus standard care among patients with hip fracture: The HIP ATTACK pilot trial. CMAJ. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 186(1). https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.130901

Readers over time

‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2508162432

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 42

53%

Researcher 22

28%

Professor / Associate Prof. 8

10%

Lecturer / Post doc 8

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 75

77%

Nursing and Health Professions 14

14%

Psychology 5

5%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 3

3%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0