Positive Behaviour Support is effective when implemented correctly: a response to “Restrictive practice–A pathway to elimination” (Spivakovsky, Steele, & Wadiwel, 2023)

Abstract

Spivakovsky et al. (2023) questioned the effectiveness of Positive Behaviour Support as an intervention for reducing challenging behaviour and the use of restrictive practices as a behaviour management approach. This article responds to their critique. We argue that the literature supports the effectiveness of Positive Behaviour Support when it is properly implemented. As employees of a Positive Behaviour Support service provider, our position is also supported by our experience of the use of Positive Behaviour Support and its beneficial outcomes. To ensure a high level of fidelity in the implementation of Positive Behaviour Support, it needs to align with the elements that underpin Positive Behaviour Support (i.e., elements of applied behaviour analysis, person-centred practice, human rights, system change) rather than simply implementing Positive Behaviour Support to meet existing legislative requirements. In conclusion, when Positive Behaviour Support service provision and implementation in Australia is correctly aligned with the core components of Positive Behaviour Support, positive outcomes for people with disabilities, including a reduction in the use of restrictive practices, can be achieved.