Genetic parameters estimates for gestation length in beef cattle

17Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Variance components were estimated for gestation length fitting the additive direct effect of calf, maternal genetic effect and sire effect as random effects. The statistical models also included the fixed effects of contemporary group, that included the date of breeding (AI), date of birth, and sex of calf, and the covariate age of dam at calving (linear and quadratic). Two different models were used, model 1 considering GL as a trait of the calf, and model 2 considering GL as a trait of the dam. The means of gestation length for the purebred animals were 294.55 days (males) and 293.34 days (females), while for the crossbred animals they were 292.49 days (males) and 292.55 days (females). Variance components for the purebred animals, fitting model 1, were 14.47, 72.78 and 57.31, for the additive genetic (σ2a ), total phenotypic (σ2p ) and residual (σ2e ) effects, respectively, with a heritability estimate of 0.21. For the crossbred animals, variance components for σ2a, σ2p, σ2e were 90.40, 127.35 and 36.95, respectively, with a heritability of 0.71. Fitting model 2, the estimated variance components for the purebred animals were 12.78, 5.01, 74.84 and 57.05 for σ2a , sire of calf (σ2asire), σ2p , and σ2e , respectively. The sire effect accounted for 0.07 (c2) of the phenotypic variance and the coefficient of repeatability was 0.17. For the crossbred animals, the variance components were 22.11 (σ2a ), 22.97 (σ2asire), 127.70 (σ2p) and 82.61 (σ2e), while c2 was 0.18 and repeatability was 0.17. Therefore, regarding selection of beef cattle, it is suggested to use the heritability estimate obtained by model 1, where GL is considered as a trait of the calf.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rocha, J. C. M. C., Tonhati, H., Alencar, M. M., & Lôbo, R. B. (2005). Genetic parameters estimates for gestation length in beef cattle. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinaria e Zootecnia, 57(6), 784–791. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-09352005000600013

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free