Analysis of the pediatric trauma score in patients wounded with shrapnel; the effect of explosives with high kinetic energy: Results of the first intervention center

1Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

BACKGROUND We aimed to assess the pediatric trauma score analysis in pediatric trauma cases due to shrapnel effect of explosives material with high kinetic energy. METHODS The data of 17 pediatric injuries were reviewed retrospectively between February 2002 and August 2005. The information about age, gender, trauma-hospital interval, trauma mechanism, the injured organs, pediatric Glasgow coma score (PGCS), pediatric trauma score (PTS), hemodynamic parameters, blood transfusion, interventions and length of hospital stay (LHS) were investigated. RESULTS While all patients suffered from trauma to the extremities, only four patients had traumatic lower-limb amputation. Transportation time was ≤1 hour in 35% of cases, and >1 hour in 65% of cases. While PTS was found as ≤8 in 35.3% of cases (n=6), the score was found to be higher than 8 in 64.7% of them (n=11). Median heart rate in patients with PTS ≤8 was 94 beats/min. This value was 70 beats/min in those with PTS >8 (p=0.007). Morbidity rates of PTS ≤8 cases and PTS >8 cases were 29.4% and 5.9%, respectively (p=0.026). While LHS was 22.8 days in PTS ≤8 cases, LHS was found to be only 4 days in PTS >8 cases. This difference was found to be statistically significant (p=0.001). CONCLUSION PTS is very efficient and a time-saving procedure to assess the severity of trauma caused by the shrapnel effect. The median heart rate, morbidity, and LHS increased significantly in patients with PTS ≤8.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Taş, H., Mesci, A., Demirbaǧ, S., Eryilmaz, M., Yiǧit, T., & Peker, Y. (2013). Analysis of the pediatric trauma score in patients wounded with shrapnel; the effect of explosives with high kinetic energy: Results of the first intervention center. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, 19(2), 140–144. https://doi.org/10.5505/tjtes.2013.06888

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free