The quality of referral letters in two health centers in Riyadh

9Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A review of 100 referral letters and reports randomly selected from two health centers in Riyadh identified that the main reason for referral was general therapeutic advice (43.2%), general diagnostic evaluation (24.8%), and routine specialist examination (11.7%). Of the total referrals, 82.1% were seen within a week in the specialist clinic. Important clinical information was lacking from both referral letters and feedback reports. For instance, past medical history, current therapy, final diagnosis, and decision on future care were omitted in 75%, 86%, 24.2%, and 56% of the letters and reports, respectively. Moreover, consultants' recommendations were specific and clear in only 56.9%. A quantitative evaluation of the quality of letters revealed that 26% of the referral letters and 47% of the feedback reports were poor. The referral process needs tremendous improvement if the quality of patient care is to be guaranteed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jarallah, J. S. (1991). The quality of referral letters in two health centers in Riyadh. Annals of Saudi Medicine, 11(6), 658–662. https://doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.1991.658

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free