Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in urinary tract infections in dogs (2010-2013)

144Citations
Citations of this article
313Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are common in dogs. The responsible bacterial populations have evolved with increasing resistance to many antimicrobials. Objective: To characterize the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of canine urinary tract isolates over a 51-month period. Animals: One thousand six hundred and thirty-six bacterial isolates from 1,028 dogs. Methods: Aerobic bacterial isolate growth and susceptibility data from urine cultures of dogs were identified, retrospectively. Medical records were reviewed to obtain signalment, comorbidities, and antimicrobial use in the previous 30 days. The UTIs were further categorized as uncomplicated, complicated, or pyelonephritis. Results: Common bacterial isolates identified were Escherichia coli (52.5%), Staphylococcus spp. (13.6%), and Enterococcus spp. (13.3%). In vitro susceptibility among all isolates varied for commonly prescribed antimicrobials (amoxicillin [59%], amoxicillin/clavulanic acid [76%], cephalexin [66%], enrofloxacin [74%] and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole [86%]). For all antimicrobials tested (except aminoglycosides), in vitro susceptibility was higher in uncomplicated versus complicated infections (P < .0001). Conclusions and Clinical Importance: In vitro susceptibility was highly variable and no PO administered antimicrobial had >90% efficacy among isolates tested. Multidrug resistance was frequent among isolates tested suggesting that routine culture and susceptibility testing is indicated. Previously prescribed antimicrobials may affect empirical choices made pending susceptibility testing.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wong, C., Epstein, S. E., & Westropp, J. L. (2015). Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in urinary tract infections in dogs (2010-2013). Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine, 29(4), 1045–1052. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.13571

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free