Measurement of effective elastance of the total respiratory system in ventilated patients by a computed method - Comparison with the static method

10Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We have studied 28 patients mechanically ventilated for acute respiratory failure at different levels of externally applied positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEPe). We describe and compare a computed method of measuring "effective" elastance of the total respiratory system (Ers,eff) with the static values of elastance of the total respiratory system (Ers, st), obtained with the end-inflation occlusion technique. Ers, eff was computed by an original device (Heres, R.P.A., Belgium), also the effective resistance of the total respiratory system was calculated. At zero end-expiratory pressure set by the ventilator (ZEEP). Ers, eff averaged 29.5±13.5 cm H2O·L-1 while Ers, st non-corrected for intrinsic PEEP (PEEPi) averaged 36.4±15.1 cm H2O·L-1 and Ers, st corrected for PEEPi averaged 28.2±13.4 cm H2O·L-1. The small difference betweenErs, eff andErs, st corrected for PEEPi was statistically significant and these two values were highly correlated (r=0.98). This significant difference disappeared rapidly with PEEPe and probably reflects a frequency-dependance due to pendelluft. We also observed that PEEPi was present in 21 of 27 patients at ZEEP. Our results also indicate that low levels of PEEP may improve Ers in hyperinflated COPD patients, without inducing further hyperinflation. In conclusion, values of Ers, eff are very similar to static values corrected for PEEPi and permit an accurate and rapid approach to the management of ventilated patients. © 1990 Springer-Verlag.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gillard, C., Flémale, A., Dierckx, J. P., & Thémelin, G. (1990). Measurement of effective elastance of the total respiratory system in ventilated patients by a computed method - Comparison with the static method. Intensive Care Medicine, 16(3), 189–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01724801

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free