What makes an incel? An interview study of current and former incels

1Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This study explores the way current and former incels discursively construct inceldom and negotiate their relationship to it. The data of six semi-structured, in-depth interviews show the difficulty self-identified former and current incels have in defining what inceldom means, who can be regarded as an incel, and what disengagement from incel communities means. Taking a discourse theoretical approach, this article analyses “incel” as a nodal point and an empty and floating signifier. It demonstrates the complex ways participants negotiate the differences between transnational online narratives and local offline experiences. The contradictory and vague nature of “incel” as a signifier shows the diversity of views and experiences present in incel communities. The findings underline the importance of acknowledging this heterogeneity when assessing the impact incel communities, and radical milieus in general, have on individuals.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lounela, E. (2026). What makes an incel? An interview study of current and former incels. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 19(1), 35–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2025.2590848

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free