Postoperative analgesia with parecoxib, acetaminophen, and the combination of both: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients undergoing thyroid surgery

31Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background. We assessed the analgesic efficacy of parecoxib, acetaminophen, and the combination of both compared with placebo in patients undergoing elective thyroid or parathyroid surgery.Methods. We randomized 140 patients to receive one of the following i.v. treatments using a double-blinded double-dummy technique: placebo, 80 mg 24 h-1 parecoxib, 5 g 24 h-1 acetaminophen, or 80 mg parecoxib plus 5 g acetaminophen. We provided rescue analgesia with piritramide delivered by a patient-controlled analgesia device. We measured opioid consumption and pain intensity over 24 h after operation.Results. Patient characteristic data, anaesthetic, and surgical characteristics of the patients in the four groups were similar. Parecoxib, acetaminophen, and the combination significantly reduced opioid requirements during 24 h after surgery [mean (sd) 12.5 (10.9) mg for parecoxib, 14.2 (12.3) mg for acetaminophen, and 11.9 (10.7) mg for combination] compared with placebo [23.5 (15.3) mg, P<0.05]. However, the combination of parecoxib and acetaminophen did not have any advantage over individual drugs in terms of opioid consumption in our trial (P>0.05).Conclusions. Parecoxib and acetaminophen effectively reduce postoperative opioid requirements after thyroid or parathyroid surgery. The combination of these drugs is not associated with a further reduction in opioid consumption. © 2010 The Author.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gehling, M., Arndt, C., Eberhart, L. H. J., Koch, T., Krüger, T., & Wulf, H. (2010). Postoperative analgesia with parecoxib, acetaminophen, and the combination of both: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients undergoing thyroid surgery. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 104(6), 761–767. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aeq096

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free