Sensitivity to attachment, alignment, and contrast polarity variation in local perceptual grouping

0Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A number of leading theories (e.g., Grossberg & Mingolla, 1985; Kellman & Shipley, 1991 ; Rensink & Enns, 1995) commonly assume that perceptual grouping by contour alignment occurs preattentively across reversing contrast polarity elements. We examined this notion in seven visual search experiments. We found that only grouping by attachment supported preattentive visual search and that grouping by contour alignment required attention in order to operate. Both attachment grouping and grouping by contour alignment were sensitive to contrast reversals. Further results showed that contour alignment was a strong grouping cue only among elements with the same contrast sign but that it did not facilitate grouping across reversing contrast. These results suggest that grouping by contour alignment operates only on inputs of consistent contrast polarity. © 2009 The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chan, L. K. H., & Hayward, W. G. (2009). Sensitivity to attachment, alignment, and contrast polarity variation in local perceptual grouping. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 71(7), 1534–1552. https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.71.7.1534

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free