Respiratory adverse effects of opioids for breathlessness: A systematic review and meta-analysis

79Citations
Citations of this article
134Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that opioids can reduce chronic breathlessness in advanced disease. However, physicians remain reluctant to prescribe opioids for these patients, commonly due to fear of respiratory adverse effects. The aim of this study was to systematically review reported respiratory adverse effects of opioids in patients with advanced disease and chronic breathlessness. PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov and the reference lists of relevant systematic reviews were searched. Two independent researchers screened against predefined inclusion criteria and extracted data. Meta-analysis was conducted where possible. We included 63 out of 1990 articles, describing 67 studies. Meta-analysis showed an increase in carbon dioxide tension (0.27 kPa, 95% CI 0.08-0.45 kPa,) and no significant change in oxygen tension and oxygen saturation (both p>0.05). Nonserious respiratory depression (definition variable/not stated) was described in four out of 1064 patients. One cancer patient pretreated with morphine for pain needed temporary respiratory support following nebulised morphine for breathlessness (single case study). We found no evidence of significant or clinically relevant respiratory adverse effects of opioids for chronic breathlessness. Heterogeneity of design and study population, and low study quality are limitations. Larger studies designed to detect respiratory adverse effects are needed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Verberkt, C. A., van den Beuken-Van Everdingen, M. H. J., Schols, J. M. G. A., Datla, S., Dirksen, C. D., Johnson, M. J., … Janssen, D. J. A. (2017, November 1). Respiratory adverse effects of opioids for breathlessness: A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Respiratory Journal. European Respiratory Society. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01153-2017

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free