Recovery from withdrawal of inhaled nitric oxide and kinetics of nitric oxide-induced inhibition of nitric oxide synthase activity in vitro

11Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: To examine the kinetics of successful nitric oxide (NO) withdrawal in vivo and in vitro. Design and setting: Prospective study in a university pediatric intensive care ward and research laboratory. Patients and materials: Nineteen patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) or persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN). Primary porcine pulmonary artery cells in vitro. Interventions: NO inhalation and withdrawal in patients; exposure to NO donor sodium nitroprusside (SNP) and gaseous NO in vitro. Measurements and results: In patients: a slight, but significant, increase of oxygenation index (OI) from 4.57 ± 0.24 cmH2O/torr (mean ± SEM) to 4.90 ± 0.26 cmH2O/torr after withdrawal of NO (p < 0.001). Recovery of OI (4.43 ± 0.23 cmH2O/torr) 30 min after weaning, a significant drop after 4 h (3.72 ± 0.17 cmH2O/torr; p < 0.001), values restored after 12 h. In vitro: NO synthase (NOS) activity was significantly lower in SNP-incubated cells (20.0 ± 4.0 μM/min) than in control cells (37.6 ± 7.0 μM/min; p < 0.05). Thirty minutes after SNP withdrawal there was NOS activity of 35.8 ± 10.0 ♂/min with a significant increase by 4 h (p < 0.05). No alteration of endothelial NOS (ENOS) mRNA expression by NO (Northern Blot). Conclusion: In patients there is a slight, but significant, reversible increase of OI after successful weaning from NO. In vitro, NO leads to a reversible decrease of ENOS activity on a post mRNA level, resembling clinical observations.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dötsch, J., Demirakça, S., Zepf, K., Hänze, J., Parida, S., & Rascher, W. (2000). Recovery from withdrawal of inhaled nitric oxide and kinetics of nitric oxide-induced inhibition of nitric oxide synthase activity in vitro. Intensive Care Medicine, 26(3), 330–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001340051158

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free