Party system closure and the liberal dimension of democracy: A double-edged sword

4Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

An institutionalized party system is often regarded as a precondition for a well-functioning democracy. Recent recesses in democracy and, in particular, in the liberal dimension of democracy in relatively established party systems, however, warrant a fresh look into how party system institutionalization shapes liberal democracy. We use a dataset that covers 58 European party systems over more than a century to assess how party system institutionalization in the governmental arena - closure - is related to more robust liberal democracy. Our results show that stable coalition combinations are conducive to higher levels of liberalism, while infrequent government changes and the exclusion of new parties from the governmental arena have a detrimental role.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mölder, M., Enyedi, Z., & Casal Bértoa, F. (2023). Party system closure and the liberal dimension of democracy: A double-edged sword. Rivista Italiana Di Scienza Politica, 53(1), 104–120. https://doi.org/10.1017/ipo.2022.22

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free