Population analysis of socioeconomic status and otolaryngologist distribution on head and neck cancer outcomes

44Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: The relationship between clinical outcomes and geographic determinants is not well known for head and neck cancer. Socioeconomic status (SES) factors and the distribution of health care resources might impact outcomes. Methods: Head and neck cancer cases in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were studied. Patient-level prognostic factors were identified from the SEER, and county-level factors were identified from the Area Health Resource File. Stage at presentation and observed survival were the outcomes of interest, with predictive factors identified by multivariate logistic and Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: On multivariate analysis, tumor site, sex, race, marital status, rural residence, and county poverty level predicted stage at presentation. Sex, race, marital status, county-level poverty, and number of otolaryngologists predicted observed survival. Conclusion: Adverse county-level SES predicted advanced cancer stage at presentation and diminished observed survival. SES was a stronger predictor of patient outcomes than rurality or number of otolaryngologists.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pagedar, N. A., Davis, A. B., Sperry, S. M., Charlton, M. E., & Lynch, C. F. (2019). Population analysis of socioeconomic status and otolaryngologist distribution on head and neck cancer outcomes. Head and Neck, 41(4), 1046–1052. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.25521

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free