Invited commentary: Causation or noitasuaC

6Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Longitudinal studies are often viewed as the "gold standard" of observational epidemiologic research. Establishing a temporal association is a necessary criterion to identify causal relations. However, when covariates in the causal system vary over time, a temporal association is not straightforward. Appropriate analytical methods may be necessary to avoid confounding and reverse causality. These issues come to light in 2 studies of breastfeeding described in the articles by Al-Sahab et al. (Am J Epidemiol. 2011;173(9):971-977) and Kramer et al. (Am J Epidemiol. 2011;173(9):978-983) in this issue of the Journal. Breastfeeding has multiple time points and is a behavior that is affected by multiple factors, many of which themselves vary over time. This creates a complex causal system that requires careful scrutiny. The methods presented here may be applicable to a wide range of studies that involve time-varying exposures and time-varying confounders. © 2011 The Author.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schisterman, E., Whitcomb, B., & Bowers, K. (2011). Invited commentary: Causation or noitasuaC. American Journal of Epidemiology, 173(9), 984–987. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwq499

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free