High PRAS40 mRNA expression and its role in prognosis of clear cell renal cell carcinoma

12Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is one of the most common type of kidney malignancy. The proline-rich Akt substrate of 40 kDa (PRAS40) plays an important role in tumor growth. The present study aimed to analysis the prognostic value of PRAS40 mRNA expression in ccRCC. Methods: We analyzed the PRAS40 mRNA expression using the data from TCGA-KIRC cohort. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was performed to assessed the diagnostic value of PRAS40 mRNA expression in ccRCC. Chi-square test was used to analyzed the correlation between clinical characteristics and PRAS40 mRNA expression. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox analysis were performed to determine the prognostic value of PRAS40 mRNA expression in ccRCC. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was conducted using TCGA database. Results: Our results revealed that PRAS40 mRNA expression was higher in ccRCC tissues than in normal tissues. PRAS40 presented a moderate diagnostic value in ccRCC. High PRAS40 mRNA expression was correlated with histological grade, clinical stage, T classification, distant metastasis and vital status of ccRCC. High PRAS40 mRNA expression was associated with poor overall survival. Furthermore, Multivariate analysis revealed that PRAS40 was an independent risk factor for ccRCC patients. Myc targets, DNA repair, oxidative phosphorylation, glycolysis, adipogenesis, p53 pathway, reactive oxygen species pathway, myogenesis were differentially enriched in the phenotype that positively correlated with PRAS40. Conclusions: In conclusion, our results suggest that PRAS40 was a promising diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for ccRCC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhou, J., Zhu, Y., Liu, Y., Niu, P., Chen, H., Deng, J., & Shi, D. (2020). High PRAS40 mRNA expression and its role in prognosis of clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Translational Andrology and Urology, 9(4), 1650–1660. https://doi.org/10.21037/tau-20-741

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free