biasplot: A package to effective plots to assess bias and precision in method comparison studies

15Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Bland and Altman’s (1986, Lancet 327: 307–310) limits of agreement have been used in many clinical research settings to assess agreement between two methods of measuring a quantitative characteristic. However, when the variances of the measurement errors of the two methods differ, limits of agreement can be misleading. biasplot implements a new statistical methodology that Taff´e (Forthcoming, Statistical Methods in Medical Research) recently developed to circumvent this issue and assess bias and precision of the two measurement methods (one is the reference standard, and the other is the new measurement method to be evaluated). biasplot produces three new plots introduced by Taff´e: the “bias plot”, “precision plot”, and “comparison plot”. These help the investigator visually evaluate the performance of the new measurement method. In this article, we introduce the user-written command biasplot and present worked examples using simulated data included with the package. Note that the Taff´e method assumes there are several measurements from the reference standard and possibly as few as one measurement from the new method for each individual.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Taffé, P., Peng, M., Stagg, V., & Williamson, T. (2017). biasplot: A package to effective plots to assess bias and precision in method comparison studies. Stata Journal, 17(1), 208–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867x1701700111

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free