XXI. On the genera heterophyllia, battersbyia, palæcyclus, and asterosmilia; the anatomy of their species, and their position in the classification of sclerodermic zoantharia

  • Duncan P
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

1. The admirable classification of the Zoantharia by MM. Milne-Edwards and Jules Haime, although very elaborate and natural, presents several very decided “breaks” in the continuity of the generic succession. The great distinction between the important families of the Turbinoliæ and Astrœidæ renders the classification rather more arti­ficial than it really is; and at first sight this classification may appear not very practical, on account of there being several genera which either cannot be placed at all or are arranged provisionally amongst certain divisions or families. The objects of this communication are to describe the species of a genus which unites the family of the Turbinolidæ to that of the Astrœidæ, to describe some very peculiar Heterophylliæ and Battersbyiæ and to classify them, and to remove the genus Palœcyclus from the family of the Fungidæ into that of the Cyathophyllidæ.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Duncan, P. M. (1867). XXI. On the genera heterophyllia, battersbyia, palæcyclus, and asterosmilia; the anatomy of their species, and their position in the classification of sclerodermic zoantharia. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, (157), 643–656. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstl.1867.0021

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free